Prioritised use-case portfolio
Compare opportunities by value assumptions, feasibility and risk.
- Decision owner and intended users
- Dependencies and measures of value
- Delivery sequence and approval gates

A clear direction for AI, with governance from day one.
Which AI use cases deserve investment, and what must be in place before they go live? We help business, technology and risk teams agree priorities, ownership and a governed route to delivery.
Competing pilots, unclear value and unclear accountability are reasons to pause and set direction. Agree who owns each use case, what the system may do and where people must oversee it.
Shape an advisory engagement around the decisions you need to make. Agree the depth and format of these outputs during scoping.
Compare opportunities by value assumptions, feasibility and risk.
Assess what each use case needs before delivery can begin.
Define accountability across business, technology and risk teams.
Define production controls, implementation responsibilities and review requirements.
Bring the decision-makers together before choosing a model or platform. Each step ends with an output to review and an owner to agree.
Agree the operating model here; implement controls with the relevant delivery teams. Advisory, security validation and software are distinct buying decisions.
Move an approved use case into the service that fits the decision and data needs.
Scope specialist AI testing, security controls and risk work separately from the governance operating model.

AI Governance brings guardrails, cost and tracing through a Linkfields layer built on Portkey and Opik. It does not replace organisational accountability.
Products are available by licence, subscription or SaaS, with or without services. Confirm fit and scope; software is not automatically included in an advisory engagement.
Consider an organisation comparing internal knowledge-assistant pilots: leaders need to assess data access, user groups and oversight before deciding where to invest. This illustrative pattern is not a client case or achieved result.
Compare the pilots against a shared decision brief. Record the value assumptions, readiness gaps and reason to prioritise, defer or stop each one.
Agree a roadmap and risk/control record. Name business approval, data access, human-review and escalation owners; identify security validation that needs a specialist team.
Give the relevant engineering team the approved scope and control requirements. Agree what evidence will support release and how operational feedback will inform the next investment review.
Bring your business priorities, current pilots and governance questions. Together, we can identify stakeholders, agree the initial scope and discuss an appropriate engagement model.
Start with the decision, current initiatives and main constraint. Select a commercial model around the uncertainty, deliverables and ownership involved.
Let’s connect