Workload & configuration review
Compare the intended architecture with the configuration of workloads in scope.
- Architecture and control-gap report
- Configuration risks and owners

Review cloud architecture and identity controls to establish clearer access boundaries and stronger cloud foundations.
A cloud rollout, access review or architecture change can expose configuration and identity gaps. Assess the agreed environment and develop a risk-ranked hardening plan. Where implementation is agreed, verify changes and record evidence.
Keep the scope clear: an advisory assessment identifies gaps; change-authorised implementation addresses them; an ongoing review is agreed separately. Link enterprise control evidence to AI security & GRC and cloud build or migration to Cloud services.
Confirm the cloud environments, IAM providers and assessment depth before authorising access, aligning the review with your architecture and access requirements.
Compare the intended architecture with the configuration of workloads in scope.
Review network paths, firewall rules and intended access boundaries.
Agree workforce, privileged and service-identity scope, including joiner–mover–leaver controls.
Connect the agreed baseline with change ownership and validation.
Example engagement pattern: a cloud workload review identifies an access-boundary gap; system owners approve hardening and verify the result.
Define systems, identities and assessment permissions. Separate read-only review from change authority.
Review the agreed design and access controls against the selected baseline.
Prioritise changes with owners, acceptance criteria and rollback responsibilities.
Check approved changes and hand over evidence with operational review responsibilities.
Apply reusable templates to the agreed environment; tailor the controls, ownership and evidence to your architecture.
Structure baseline checks for scoped workloads, access boundaries and identities.
Connect the requirements agreed with risk and legal owners to technical controls and evidence.
Confirm applicable CIS or vendor baselines and any ISO/IEC 27001:2022 mapping before assessment. An AI gateway is a separate scope, not an automatic cloud-security deliverable.
Agree the technical, data-access and legal boundaries before work. Control mapping is not certification and does not replace legal advice.
Agree least-privilege assessment access, test information, secure transfer and retention.
Client system owners approve changes and define recovery responsibilities.
Link each risk to the approved action, validation result and any residual exception.
Start with your cloud and identity environment and review objective. Do not send credentials, secrets or detailed architecture; agree a secure exchange after scoping.
Let’s connect